I think you've misread both articles, and taken quite a bit out of context. The first article talks about an increase in 57,000 jobs this month, while the second article clearly states that the data revision is being done for a past month, which is March 2003. Since March 2003's employment figures are being revised, the previously expected trend has changed since then. Nothing more.
This isn't a case of disinformation. Quit being paranoid.