A bit more realism for you guys. The network tech guys may have been doing their jobs and a security hole may still exist. You can't realistically expect them to have a unhackable network. I don't know how this appointed martyr handled it so I don't know if I approve of what he did. All I know is that if administrators did their job - there'd still be a problem. And if hackers didn't hack them - the problem ceases to exist. So where does the blame lie?
I'm not a anti-hacker either. I just like to keep it simple. I don't pretend that hacking is right. It's wrong, and that's why we love it.