What are your views? I have done months of research on this and I am convinced there is more to 9/11 than we have been told. At the very least I feel the US let it happen. At the worst case they did it. Lets open this up to debate. I will list my facts below. First I will cover coincidences.

  • The Partiot act is known to have been writen before 9/11
  • Jhon O'neil Was the FBI's top Al Qaeda expert. He had warned top officials for months about an impending attack and was shut down after over 50 attempts to get priority put on this topic. He eventualy quit the FBI and started his new job at the WTC on Sept 10. Yes he died the next day.
  • Fire Fighters describe explosions inside the building on various floors to include the basement floors. Also many building residents describe similar explosions after the planes hit.
  • We see a huge fire ball as the plane hits each building. That is obviously jeat fule igniting. There wouldn't be much left to build inside so how did the steel melt?
  • Never before has a sky scraper building fallen due to fire in history. On 9/11 3 fell. A first in history and it happened 3 times.
  • The owner of the WTC complex Larry Silverstein had just bought it 6 months before and made a ton of loot in insurance claims. About 7 billion in profit.
  • Steel mealts at around 2500F or 1379C. http://education.jlab.org/qa/meltingpoint_01.html
  • Jet fule in perfect conditions burns at 980C (1796F) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jet_fuel
  • Typicaly a uncontrolled fall of a building will not fall straight down in a nice pile in its own basement. For the first time in history not one but 3 buildings fell as if it were a controlled demolition. Straight down.
  • The buildings fell faster than the rate of gravity. In other words if you threw a rock off the top of the building and it fell at the same time, the building would have beat the rock to the bottom. How can this be as the building has to fall through it self, and all its supports?
  • Larry Siverstien admits on cammera he made the decision to "pull" building 7. Here atake a look http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6905631612206278007&q=Larry+Silverstein
    Later he recants and says he meant have the people pulled out(building was empty). Whats the big deal if they demoed Building 7? Well think about it. How long does it take to plan and execute a demolition? This all happened on 9/11. So in the wake of all this chos, they went in a building they didn't think was safe planted the demo charges and took it down all in hours? Or maybe the explosions were there before. BTW building 7 was housing much edvidence to later be used in Enron trials and other CEO abuse cases. It was also home to quite a few other government organizations.
  • http://www.newamericancentury.org a Conservative think tank group made up of many persons close to Bush and the Bush cabinet had plans to invade IRAQ long before 9/11. In thier plan they said baring a "Perl harbor event" it would take a long time to get american support.
  • In the 1962 a plan was concieved by the Pentagon to drum up american support for an invasion of cuba. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Northwoods Opperation Northwoods. The plan involved attacks on US civilians, remote controled airliner and terror attacks in US cities. This was rejected by Keneddy.
  • The 5 frames of the video the pentagon released showing the plane crash into the pentagon show no plane.

I do notice a trail of smoke though.
Now look at these...

As low as the plane would have had to be why is the lawn so perfect? Why aren't though spools moved? There are other picture before the fire collapsed the wall. At first there was only a 17 ft diameter hole. Where did the wings and engine go? See any debrie in the yard?
My New site OpenEyes