UGN Security Forums
My ProfileMember DirectoryLogin
Search our ForumsView our FAQView our Site Rules
View our CalendarView our Active TopicsGo to our Main Page

UGN Security Store
 

Network Sites UGN Security, The GoNix Initiative, Elite Web Gamers, Back of the Web, EveryDay Helper, VNC Web Design & Development
December
Su M Tu W Th F Sa
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31
Sponsored Links
Latest Postings
Latest Reviews
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#34494 - 08/17/05 10:22 PM Decision delayed for '.xxx' domain
IceMyst Offline
UGN Elite Poster

Registered: 10/22/03
Posts: 1449
Loc: Where ever Gizmo is
NEW YORK (AP) -- The Internet's key oversight agency agreed Tuesday to a one-month delay in approving a new ".xxx" domain name after the U.S. government cited "unprecedented" opposition to a virtual red-light district.

Michael D. Gallagher, assistant secretary for communications and information at the Commerce Department, had stopped short of urging its rejection, but he called on the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers to "ensure the best interests of the Internet community as a whole are fully considered."

The department received nearly 6,000 letters and e-mails expressing concerns about the impact of pornography on families and children and objecting to setting aside a domain suffix for it, he said.

"The volume of correspondence opposed to creation of a .xxx TLD [domain name] is unprecedented," Gallagher wrote to Vinton Cerf, ICANN's chairman.

Gallagher said ICANN should take more time to evaluate those concerns.

The chairman of ICANN's Government Advisory Committee, Mohd Sharil Tarmizi, also wrote ICANN officials last week urging delay and expressing "a strong sense of discomfort" among many countries, which he did not name.

ICANN's board decided Tuesday to rescheduled the matter for September 15.

Approval had been expected as early as Tuesday, five years after the domain name was first proposed and two months after ICANN gave it a tentative OK.

Gallagher's letter, sent last week and made public Monday, had particular resonance because his agency has veto power over ICANN decisions given the U.S. government's role in funding early developing of the Internet and selecting ICANN in 1998 to oversee domain name administration.

But ICANN also was swayed by an agreement to a one-month delay by the chief backers of ".xxx," ICM Registry Inc. of Jupiter, Florida.

Two in five Internet users visited an adult site in April, according to tracking by comScore Media Metrix. The company said 4 percent of all Web traffic and 2 percent of all surfing time involved an adult site.

ICM proposed ".xxx" as a mechanism for the $12 billion online porn industry to clean up its act. All sites using ".xxx" would be required to follow yet-to-be-written "best practices" guidelines, such as prohibitions against trickery through spamming and malicious scripts.

Use of ".xxx" would be voluntary, however.

Skeptics note that porn sites are likely to keep their existing ".com" storefronts, even as they set up shop in the new ".xxx" domain name, reducing the effectiveness of any software filters set up to simply block all ".xxx" names.

Conservative groups such as the Family Research Council also expressed worries that creating a ".xxx" suffix would also legitimize pornographers.

But ICM chairman Stuart Lawley, in a response to ICANN, pointed out that the agency already offered ample opportunity to raise objections.

"We are, to say the very least, disappointed that concerns that should have been raised and addressed weeks and months ago are being raised in the final days," he said.

In an interview, ICM founder Jason Hendeles suggested the criticism stemmed from a misunderstanding of the proposal, and he said its executives would spend the next month trying to clarify its intent.

ICANN on Tuesday also delayed approval of a less controversial domain name, ".cat" for sites devoted to Catalan language and culture, citing a need to further clarify terms of a proposed contract with its sponsors.

More than 260 domain name suffixes exist, mostly country codes such as ".fr" for France. Recent additions include ".eu" for the European Union and ".mobi" for mobile services.
Source
_________________________
*Hell hath no fury like a womens anger and damn be the fool who gets in her way*

Donate to the "Baby Trey's Digital Camera" fund here .

Top
Sponsored Links
      
#34495 - 08/18/05 05:18 PM Re: Decision delayed for '.xxx' domain
Gremelin Offline

Community Owner
*****

Registered: 02/28/02
Posts: 7193
Loc: Portland, OR; USA
bfd, content lockers (like netnanny) will just blacklist the extension as a whole; i see no problems...
_________________________
Donate to UGN Security here.
UGN Security, Back of the Web, Elite Web Gamers & VNC Web Design Owner

Top
#34496 - 08/18/05 08:18 PM Re: Decision delayed for '.xxx' domain
§intå× Offline


*****

Registered: 12/03/02
Posts: 3255
Loc: Maryland
Quote:
Conservative groups such as the Family Research Council also expressed worries that creating a ".xxx" suffix would also legitimize pornographers.
legitimize...

It is a leagal business. It is legit as far as I know. It isn't like if we stop .xxx we can stop porn on the net. But we could then later say all porn must be on .xxx.

Then rule for each other extension that to own the domain you will not put pornagraphic images up.
_________________________
My New site OpenEyes

Top
#34497 - 08/18/05 10:36 PM Re: Decision delayed for '.xxx' domain
Gremelin Offline

Community Owner
*****

Registered: 02/28/02
Posts: 7193
Loc: Portland, OR; USA
I still fail to see what the big problem is here... I mean we have all of these "keyword" and "content" blockers, many for free... I fail to see why they can't just block this "xxx" extention for users who opt to do so...

I'd however love to see the .com/net/org's ridded of porn; sites like whitehouse.com are a complete waste of bandwidth...
_________________________
Donate to UGN Security here.
UGN Security, Back of the Web, Elite Web Gamers & VNC Web Design Owner

Top
#34498 - 08/19/05 01:33 AM Re: Decision delayed for '.xxx' domain
IceMyst Offline
UGN Elite Poster

Registered: 10/22/03
Posts: 1449
Loc: Where ever Gizmo is
because of sites like whitehouse.com little kids get to sites they shouldnt see. my sister/neice/whatever you want to call her went a little mermaid site when she was 5 years old on my dad's work computer and it turned out to be hardcore porn. by making the .xxx extention stuff like that wont happen... it will be so much easier to keep porn out of young kids hands...
_________________________
*Hell hath no fury like a womens anger and damn be the fool who gets in her way*

Donate to the "Baby Trey's Digital Camera" fund here .

Top
#34499 - 08/19/05 04:58 AM Re: Decision delayed for '.xxx' domain
Artic Warrior Offline
UGN Member

Registered: 11/12/03
Posts: 478
Loc: My room
People will find porn if they want it. If they do make this "xxx" suffix, would porn sites have to add it to thier URL? I can see not all will, especially those outside the US. Though it will make it easier for Net Nanny etc. to block access to these sites.
But this would be a big change and I agree with the delay. Maybe they figured out a sort of back-lash just before the release.
I dont know If im for or against this.
_________________________

Top
#34500 - 08/19/05 10:45 AM Re: Decision delayed for '.xxx' domain
Gremelin Offline

Community Owner
*****

Registered: 02/28/02
Posts: 7193
Loc: Portland, OR; USA
Quote:
Originally posted by Artic Warrior:
People will find porn if they want it. If they do make this "xxx" suffix, would porn sites have to add it to thier URL? I can see not all will, especially those outside the US. Though it will make it easier for Net Nanny etc. to block access to these sites.
They could tigheten the restrictions on what is qualified to operate on non-xxx suffix's which would limit pornography.
_________________________
Donate to UGN Security here.
UGN Security, Back of the Web, Elite Web Gamers & VNC Web Design Owner

Top
#34501 - 08/19/05 02:48 PM Re: Decision delayed for '.xxx' domain
§intå× Offline


*****

Registered: 12/03/02
Posts: 3255
Loc: Maryland
Who said that? Remember? Good looking guy, real smart. Who said that? Oh I know...


Quote:
Originally posted by int:
Quote:
Conservative groups such as the Family Research Council also expressed worries that creating a ".xxx" suffix would also legitimize pornographers.
legitimize...

It is a leagal business. It is legit as far as I know. It isn't like if we stop .xxx we can stop porn on the net. But we could then later say all porn must be on .xxx.

Then rule for each other extension that to own the domain you will not put pornagraphic images up.
_________________________
My New site OpenEyes

Top

Featured Member
Registered: 10/28/14
Posts: 1
Forum Stats
2152 Members
46 Forums
36214 Topics
71384 Posts

Max Online: 1567 @ 04/25/10 05:20 AM
Top Posters
UGN Security 29375
Gremelin 7193
§intå× 3255
SilentRage 1273
Ice 1146
pergesu 1136
Infinite 1041
jonconley 955
Girlie 908
unreal 860
Newest Members
cdefgh368568, HushHush, golqm, Tim050, Gecko666
2151 Registered Users
Who's Online
0 registered (), 364 Guests and 340 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Latest News


Donate
  Get Firefox!
Get FireFox!