No Weapons of Mass Destruction

Posted by: sinetific

No Weapons of Mass Destruction - 07/10/04 08:53 AM

Memebers of our government admit there was no evidence of wmd or links to Osama Bin Laden, Al-Qaeda, or the Taliban. So, after starting a war killing massive amounts of iraqis, torturing them, and bombing the hell out of thier country, should George W. Bush be held accountable and go infornt of the world court for war crimes along side with Saddam Hussein?
Posted by: IceMyst

Re: No Weapons of Mass Destruction - 07/11/04 02:20 AM

NO only did he lie to the world, he lied to the people of the united states. he was voted in to do what the majority wanted but in the process made an ass of our country. I cant even count how many things i've seen online from other counties that compair us to nazi germany and bush to hitler himself. if he's not held accountable then why should Saddam Hussein? oh i know why because of 9-11 that gives us the right to bomb any country we even think had a part in that... *cough* bullshit *cough*
Posted by: sinetific

Re: No Weapons of Mass Destruction - 07/11/04 06:55 AM

(like my fark icemyst?)
Posted by: IceMyst

Re: No Weapons of Mass Destruction - 07/11/04 09:45 AM

enough where i had to save it so i can share it with the world...
Posted by: Gremelin

Re: No Weapons of Mass Destruction - 07/11/04 09:45 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by sinetific:
(like my fark icemyst?)
His face is too bright; but other than that it's a great job ...

Personally I don't feel that he should go to World court; he went and fixed an error of previous judgement by placing Osoma and Saddam in power to begin with; basically going back to the fact that we should keep our noses out of other peoples business
Posted by: Defcon

Re: No Weapons of Mass Destruction - 07/12/04 04:45 AM

Yeah but now that we have Saddam out of power (Dunno about Osama, I mean how the fuck can you not find a 6ft. tall pissed off arabic man on Kidney Dyalisis, $5 says the US will "capture" him before the election), what now, we just gonna put another crack pot in power that looks the other way when it's Oil Exportin' time?

Forced Democracy, Paradoxal in away.

World Court, please, the US has done whatever the fuck it wants, whenever the fuck it wants without fear or retrobution from the international community. He'll get re-elected, stamp out more of our rights, piss away the economy, and get on the nerves of every nation on Earth.... yup he'll out do his Daddy just like he wanted.
Posted by: Gremelin

Re: No Weapons of Mass Destruction - 07/12/04 05:42 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Defcon:
Yeah but now that we have Saddam out of power (Dunno about Osama, I mean how the fuck can you not find a 6ft. tall pissed off arabic man on Kidney Dyalisis, $5 says the US will "capture" him before the election), what now, we just gonna put another crack pot in power that looks the other way when it's Oil Exportin' time?
I believe they made a democratic party there to attempt to make them with us :rollseyes:...

And hey, Bush is better than Kerry... Kerry "missed" the vote for supporting our troops who are out of the country, but he magically managed to be available to vote against the Lacy Peterson law (protecing pregnent women from abusive fucks who like to kill them).
Posted by: Defcon

Re: No Weapons of Mass Destruction - 07/15/04 01:12 AM

http://www.blackstarsblog.com/bushin41point2.htm

So what if Kerry doesn't know how to vote in the Senate, atleast he's not a liar, although I think Bush himself is just a pawn. Cheney is the real slimy fuck, as well as the rest of his staff. I say we elect Massachusetts other senator.... Ted Kennedy!
Posted by: Gremelin

Re: No Weapons of Mass Destruction - 07/15/04 08:16 AM

Lol you actually think presidents have a choice? We all know there are shadow goverments in place, and the senate...
Posted by: Defcon

Re: No Weapons of Mass Destruction - 07/15/04 06:44 PM

STFU Bush Supporter, stop changing the subject!
Posted by: Gremelin

Re: No Weapons of Mass Destruction - 07/16/04 08:02 AM

Lol; I don't support Bush, however; lesser of two evil's (for the second time at that).
Posted by: IceMyst

Re: No Weapons of Mass Destruction - 07/16/04 08:03 AM

i say gizmo should be president fuck bush and fuck kerry...

his words:
"free sex, free health care, no social security... dark times, dark dark times.... and at least i'll share my top secret toys with you."
Posted by: Red Mage

Re: No Weapons of Mass Destruction - 07/18/04 04:10 AM

Quote:
Posted by: Gremelin

Re: No Weapons of Mass Destruction - 07/18/04 05:18 AM

We saw it the first time; no one is intereted...

We all know the race is between Bush and Kerry; Kerry will hopefully loose or I'm moving to Canada...
Posted by: §intå×

Re: No Weapons of Mass Destruction - 07/18/04 10:03 AM

3rd part candidates have never won in the history of major US elections. What they have done is tip the ballance by taking some of one of the partys votes they would have other wise goten.

It's like this. The guy above sounds conservative looking at his poster and all. So this guy would probably take some of Bushes votes. This may allow Kerry to win.

Kerry's voting record I must admit is scary at best. So it looks like another 4 years of Bush and Chaney.
Posted by: §intå×

Re: No Weapons of Mass Destruction - 07/18/04 10:16 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Gizmo:
Quote:
Originally posted by sinetific:
(like my fark icemyst?)
His face is too bright; but other than that it's a great job ...

Personally I don't feel that he should go to World court; he went and fixed an error of previous judgement by placing Osoma and Saddam in power to begin with; basically going back to the fact that we should keep our noses out of other peoples business
Now Gizmo, rember these errors were errors his daddy and his daddys boss made. Osama, and Sadam came into power helped by the US during the late 70's (Sadam) to early 80's Osama.

George Bush Sr was head of the entire CIA before being US vice president. There is that shadow government you were talking about. So a man walks out of a protected controling seat and into the public eye with little or no true power as a VP.

I have a feeling that in decadeas to come people will talk about the Bush presidencys like we talk about the keneddy assasination. There is some really screw stuff here. I mean I keep thinking.

We were in the middle east all throughout Regan and, Bush's prescidency. Clinton years barely heard about it. Now we are back over there in mass numbers.

That is 12 years under Regan and Bush sr. 8 under Clinton, Now another 8 under Bush jr.?
Posted by: Red Mage

Re: No Weapons of Mass Destruction - 07/19/04 09:32 AM

Quote:
Kerry will hopefully loose or I'm moving to Canada...
Not sure that makes sense.. Kerry will make us socialist, but Canada already is. Try moving to..... dang it, there are no capitalist coutries left..

Quote:
World Court, please, the US has done whatever the fuck it wants, whenever the fuck it wants without fear or retrobution from the international community.
It won't happen. The "international community" for the most part wouldn't get involved (sure, France has a dumbass president, but that's an exception). Besides, it would be a bad idea to put the president up against an international court. If he's tried, it needs to be in US.

Quote:
NO only did he lie to the world, he lied to the people of the united states.
There's actually quite a bit of evidence that he recieved bad intellegence, and /didn't/ ask for a reason to attack Iraq. His intellegence told him it was a "slam dunk".

NOTE: Don't take this the wrong way. If you feel like I support Bush, refer to my previous post..
Posted by: Gremelin

Re: No Weapons of Mass Destruction - 07/19/04 09:47 AM

I wouldn't be moving because he's a socialist, I'd be moving because he's a fucking idiot; more-so than bush.

We all know you don't support bush; however neither do we; we just however like bush a hell of a lot more than kerry..
Posted by: Mage

Re: No Weapons of Mass Destruction - 08/17/04 09:17 AM

What's to like about either of them? Why does it seem that in a country of hundreds of millions, those two are the only choice? Something has gone awry in the world of "Democracy".....perhaps "Demonocracy" would fit better. Why doesn't the whole damn country turn up to vote and spoil their votes by writing "To fuck with the two of you" on their ballot papers......
Posted by: xacex

Re: No Weapons of Mass Destruction - 08/17/04 09:28 PM

Well - Actually there has been reports that the CIA told Bush many, many times in advance and while the war was on, that there was not enough evidence to attack Iraq based on the facts they had recieved. That we had a shot in hell to find WMD. The head of the CIA even said that he was told to keep quite about these facts and go with the President. Which is contrary to what an Intellegence Agency is suppose to be for.

Kerry and Bush - they are both one in the same. Any government that would take advantage of any cituation (9/11), public hysteria and fear to write in a law (Patriot Act) that makes the government more centralized and allows our rights to be revoked - then after a year shoved the PA under the covers and have us forget about it - is wrong, and shouldn't be let to be in power anymore. That is a vast abuse of power. Kerry's suppose to be so liberal - yeah? Really? Then why does he support the PA? Oh, that's right, he has a political aggenda - that is far more important to him than the rights of the people.

I won't be voting for either candidate. I want a president who cares about the best interest America and the American people more than his political career or party offiliation.
Posted by: drkmercinary

Re: No Weapons of Mass Destruction - 10/21/04 08:26 PM

ok, ok I see your point all of then He did screw up but its better than finding out the hard way if their are or are not wmd's
You got to agree with me on that
And who really want to have that herman munster lookalike Kerry for a president for the next four years HE HAS NO FACIAL EXPRESSION MUSCLES
Posted by: Aelphaeis Mangarae

Re: No Weapons of Mass Destruction - 10/26/04 05:45 PM

They never had WOMD, if they did they would of used them.

What are they waiting for ?

America has already invaded Iraq 2 or 3 times...