If you do have it enabled, why can't I see mine? I wrote a random image script in ASP and it works on other forums....why not this one?


Test: [img]http://s2.csmn-ctd.net/imaruki/random.aspx[/img]

Okay, so it works inside the thread but not in my sig.

It's disabled; RE: I could care less to see images scroll by in sig's...

I friggin hate image signatures. Outright obnoxious.

Agreed, especially the images in his script

Okay, I understand.

i PMd giz for my invite

?? I don't have a yahoo account in the first place; let alone one which I could give invitations to anything from... You're talking about GMail ...

yea mate.
GMail.

Imaruki's sig reads (on the top) : 'PM me for an invite, GMail'

i pm'd u for my Gmail invite.

yea, i know this is a double post.
but this [censored] is weird!

i swear, previous to the above post i could see Imaruki's sig and he had this shaun.pcgeek[at]gmail email with the Gmail logo and the lot.

now, however, i can see the yahoo sig giz is talking about.
whoa!

anyone else had that problem?
perhaps the sig refreshed or something?

im at a loss.

iv just edited this post and i can see the gmail sig again!
iv saved the sig in bitmap format. i just emailed it to u giz.

img tags aren't permitted in sig's...

For crying outloud, edit the first post! Man you don't listen well...

Just to let you know Inf, after half an hour users cannot edit posts; yeh I know EndGame was within this 30 minute period, but just letting you know.

EndGame, if the 30 minute period hasn't expired, and you're posting to a standard thread (not a news article or review) please edit your previous post rather than spamming to get your postcount up.

while we are on that topic, why is it only 30 minutes? I want to be able to edit my posts for at least like that day or something.

Because, there have been many MANY cases of users going back and completely deleting all content of their posts; which leads discussion off or can even make a discussion completely pointless...

Besides, it's more fun to watch people get completely pissed off then try to retract their comments!

I've never wanted to retract any comments, I've wanted to fix my spelling so that I didn't look like such a vo-tard.

You're a moderator, you should be able to edit anything you (or someone else) has posted in a forum you moderate .. Else, you're screwed too lol...

I don't often need to edit a post in the news forum They are cut and pasted articles, therefore I don't have the opportunity to [censored] them up.

Yeh, well, I justify such a "low time" with this one reason; if you feel you need to spell check, do it before you post... It's not like we dont have a spellcheck button on every input box...

blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda


:p

Spell check? We dont need no stinking spell check.

i know about being able to edit your posts giz/j.
in fact id say most of my non-news posts have been edited time and time again by myself.

the wierd thing is, it seems my computer is quite fickle when it comes to allowing me to edit my posts.

if you read this post, ul see i was able to edit this post after i saw the yahoo sig.
what u cant see however, is that i DID try to incorporate this post in the one preceeding it.
i was given the msg that the time to edit my post has elapsed.
funnily enough tho, i was able to edit THIS post as u can read towards the end of the post: iv just edited this post and i can see the gmail sig again!

i dont know why this is happening, but iv reported it on the 'Bugs' board now.

you remind me a lot of weeve. I know there must be something sensible that you are trying to say, but I can't decode whatever the [censored] that is most of the time. Only you are worse than weeve, because at least he comes across sounding intelligent and it's just that I'm not up to his level or something, you just plain [censored] don't make any sense. Whatever message you are trying to convey gets lost about 2 seconds into your post. I just thought I'd put that out there for ya...

I get what he means...

Since we're on the topic of the website, why is this in the source?

(</)script>
<!-- -->
(</)head>

(<)body bgcolor="#000000" text="#FFFFFF" link="#8CA3D6" vlink="#FFFFFF" alink = "#FFFFFF" >

<!-- <font size="1px" color="#000000">hack crack cheat game security steal hacking hackers hacked cracking cracked cracks crackers cracker hackers secure computer computers pc mac macintosh macintrash microsoft windows linux bsd slackware slack ware redhat red hat fedora black black hat hats hatters white blackhat blackhats blackhatters whitehat whitehats whitehatters hate hater haters war cyber cyberwar felony crime conviction help assist assistance assistant newb newbie newbied newbert n00b leet l33t 1337 31337 jeet j33t jeat l34t elite 3l1t3 bored boredom gaming diablo warcraft craft dvd rip ripping rippers review reviews reviewers illegal legality smoke die mess with the best die like the rest i am root rewt rooter kit rooting rewting rootering rooot uncle sam iraq tank millitary sucks suck sucking sucker suckers general ugn underground under ground news undergroundnews fire fox firefox theft theaft theving theaving theaves theeves thevs theves</font> -->
(<)script language="Javascript1.1" type="text/javascript">

It just seems odd that it'd just be sitting there, apparently doing nothing...

NOTE: I had to put most of the operators in parenthesis to throw off the server (the code UBB setting SERIOUSLY messes up the forum spacing)

key words for websearches