yeah SR is right about the BMP [censored] (what I wasn't sure about mentionning above
).thx. 3 bytes per pixel, multiply that by the pizels in yer pic, And you've got 1 fat pic...
K anyways, well Jpeg2000 Is something i read about recently. It has apparently kick-[censored] compression cuz You don't see data loss (u did with jpeg). I asked myself the same questions, what encodes it, what can read it, is the extension different. Well I'l try and read up some more about this and keep u guys posted.
As a conclusion, I would like to re-state what SR said in case there is misundertanding over this:
BMP is RAW, so quality is as its best. a pic CANNOT be any better quality, and if it's worst, it's coming from the prog, not the format.