You're a moderator, you should be able to edit anything you (or someone else) has posted in a forum you moderate .. Else, you're screwed too lol...

I don't often need to edit a post in the news forum They are cut and pasted articles, therefore I don't have the opportunity to fuck them up.

Yeh, well, I justify such a "low time" with this one reason; if you feel you need to spell check, do it before you post... It's not like we dont have a spellcheck button on every input box...

blah blah blah yadda yadda yadda


:p

Spell check? We dont need no stinking spell check.

i know about being able to edit your posts giz/j.
in fact id say most of my non-news posts have been edited time and time again by myself.

the wierd thing is, it seems my computer is quite fickle when it comes to allowing me to edit my posts.

if you read this post, ul see i was able to edit this post after i saw the yahoo sig.
what u cant see however, is that i DID try to incorporate this post in the one preceeding it.
i was given the msg that the time to edit my post has elapsed.
funnily enough tho, i was able to edit THIS post as u can read towards the end of the post: iv just edited this post and i can see the gmail sig again!

i dont know why this is happening, but iv reported it on the 'Bugs' board now.

you remind me a lot of weeve. I know there must be something sensible that you are trying to say, but I can't decode whatever the fuck that is most of the time. Only you are worse than weeve, because at least he comes across sounding intelligent and it's just that I'm not up to his level or something, you just plain ass don't make any sense. Whatever message you are trying to convey gets lost about 2 seconds into your post. I just thought I'd put that out there for ya...

I get what he means...

Since we're on the topic of the website, why is this in the source?

(

(

(<)body bgcolor="#000000" text="#FFFFFF" link="#8CA3D6" vlink="#FFFFFF" alink = "#FFFFFF" >


(<)script language="Javascript1.1" type="text/javascript">

It just seems odd that it'd just be sitting there, apparently doing nothing...

NOTE: I had to put most of the operators in parenthesis to throw off the server (the code UBB setting SERIOUSLY messes up the forum spacing)

key words for websearches

if THAT's for websearches then wtf is this?

(

(<)meta name="robots" content="index,follow" />
(<)meta name="resource-type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
(<)meta name="keywords" content="Hacking, Satellite, Security, Cracking, Phreaking, Boxing, Anarchy, Pirating, BBS, Bulletin Board, System, Computers, Telephones, phones, texts, text, archive, store, online, hackers, hacker, phreak, phreaks, UGN Security, news">
(<)meta name="description" content="UGN Security is one of the internet's largest HPCA communities. We have an extencive file and texts archive and a large IRC and Bulletin Board chat.">
(<)meta name="author" CONTENT="VNC Web Design, http://www.virtualnightclub.net/">
(<)meta name="revisit-after" content="2 days">
(<)meta name="rating" content="General">
(<)meta name="distribution" content="Global">
(<)style type="text/css">

c'mon man, expand your thought process. Why can't they both be for that?

Most webbots ignore meta keywords and only look at content.

But why do we want everyone searching for "Illegal Uncle Suckers" ending up here? :p

'eh most webbots only snag content; the majority of them ignore keywords now adays...