#38129 - 12/25/02 02:49 AM
Re: Flying Cars By The End Of The Decade?
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 129
Drake
UGN Member
|
UGN Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 129
Long Beach, California
|
Maybe the engines would be built with a fale safe so that they automatically level off at a certain alitutude. That'd be better than just saying "don't fly that high" cause that would just make you want to do it. Another thing they could do if you run out of gas, ejection seats. You don't die, you just lose your car. Fair enough for being stupid enough to run out of fuel in the first place.
The lover of inquiry must follow his beloved wherever it may lead him. -Socrates
|
|
|
#38130 - 12/25/02 03:24 AM
Re: Flying Cars By The End Of The Decade?
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 860
unreal
Der Übeltäter
|
Der Übeltäter

Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 860
Likes: 1
KCRQ
|
There would need to be a decent buffer between the lowest altitude for planes and the highest for plaars (i'm calling these flying cars plaars), unreal do you have any suggestions on that? That's fine and good in cruise flight, but what about if a plane wants to climb/descend? Transitioning through scores of "plaars" would be horribly dangerous. Most people believe that flying cars can be a reality because they look up and see nothing but blue skies. Not many planes, right? Believe me, the skies are crowded enough as it is.
|
|
|
#38131 - 12/25/02 03:32 PM
Re: Flying Cars By The End Of The Decade?
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 574
Cold Sunn
UGN GFX Whore
|
UGN GFX Whore
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 574
Likes: 1
us
|
Wouldn't planes only be in the Plaar Zone when they are landing or in an emergency? At places like airports and whatnot, there would be a plaarking lot away from the airport, then shuttles or maglevs to the airport. If there is an emergency, a plane needing to land in a field or something but plaars in the way, the pilot doesn't have to worry about the plaars, he should do what they would normally do. The plaar drivers on the other hand would be alerted (ahead of time) by their on-board oh-[censored]-ographer that a plane is coming and they would get out of the way as they were required to know how to do to get their plaar license.
Drake- the eject thing sounds good at first. Then in the next moment I realize there are more the likely going to be plaars all around you, not to mention the few people that still on the ground (in the future most people live in floating apartments...not really...well maybe). I think better than a parachute (and you didn't say it had to be a parachute, I just assume) would be a hanglider, but there is still the plaar falling and killing things. They could just do like unreal said and do an emergency coast thing. But I still think better than that is an emergency fuel that only gets tapped into when the first is empty. (or low pressure or low amperage or lacking Qierhasfles.)
unreal- the streets are pretty crowded too.
I think, if they just make the laws really strict, the tests really hard, and the plaars well made, then they can start good and end it better. As long as they don't start off with the laws too loose I think it could be very safe. Maybe make the minimum plaar license age 25 or something. Have a lower acceptable blood/alcohol level - nationwide so there is no bullshit with state laws. Have much higher safety standards, there will still be some accidents but if you make these things strong enough they won't just fall out of the sky after an accident. Of course it would be required by law to sink down to the ground and do the trading insurance thing. No weapons, no dangerous chemicals, etc. If they start off tough, no one will [censored] and get laws thrown out when they tighten them later.
That stuff makes sense to me, but alot of you guys look at things differently so maybe you see something wrong there that i don't.
|
|
|
#38132 - 01/03/03 08:23 PM
Re: Flying Cars By The End Of The Decade?
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 129
Drake
UGN Member
|
UGN Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 129
Long Beach, California
|
Cold Sunn, I don't understand why a hangglider would be better than a parachute. Would you mind expaling that for me? What if, instead of reserve fuel for the main jets, there was a seperate fuel tank for a second set of smaller jets that would only be strong enough to get you a couple feet off the ground and only for about ten, fifteen miles. Then, when you start to run out of gas, you hear/see the warning light, you say "[censored]," then you get your plaar down close to the ground, the reserve jets kick in and there you are hobbling your stupid [censored] to the nearest gas station.
The lover of inquiry must follow his beloved wherever it may lead him. -Socrates
|
|
|
#38133 - 01/03/03 11:59 PM
Re: Flying Cars By The End Of The Decade?
|
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,202
Gremelin
Community Owner
|
Community Owner

Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,202
Likes: 11
Portland, OR; USA
|
Originally posted by Drake: Another thing they could do if you run out of gas, ejection seats. You don't die, you just lose your car. Fair enough for being stupid enough to run out of fuel in the first place. You [censored] moron... Lets see, your dumbass runs out of gas, you're 300 feet in the air, theres two levels of "space car" traffic, and a school under that, your not refueling your car, in that scinario, just possibly killed 900 people, smooth...
|
|
|
#38134 - 01/06/03 05:37 AM
Re: Flying Cars By The End Of The Decade?
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 129
Drake
UGN Member
|
UGN Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 129
Long Beach, California
|
thanks Giz. I'm sure everybody here is an idiot who needs to have everything restated. Take a look at Cold Sunn's post. Sound familiar?
The lover of inquiry must follow his beloved wherever it may lead him. -Socrates
|
|
|
|
Forums41
Topics33,701
Posts68,795
Average Daily Posts0
|
Members2,174
Most Online1,567 Apr 25th, 2010
|
|
|
Okay WTF?
by HenryMiring on 09/27/17 08:45 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|